← Coding AgentProduct dashboard example · Faber prototype data, separate from TR-042

Faber Tactical Allocation Backtest

● Completed
Edit Strategy

Does 10-month trend timing improve a diversified asset basket?

KEY FINDINGS

The short answer up front

Baseline findings

Defensive, but implementation-sensitive

ANNUALISED RETURN

4.43%

Annualised strategy return

SHARPE RATIO

0.65

Risk-adjusted return

MAX DRAWDOWN

−15.3%

Peak-to-trough decline

CASH EXPOSURE

$309m

As reported in source

CONFIDENCE

Moderate

Implementation-sensitive

The timing rule materially reduced drawdown versus an always-invested basket, but gave up long-run return. Confidence depends on portfolio phase-in, cash yield and benchmark construction

PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW

How the strategy performed over time

Growth of $100m

Growth after costs

Timing

$210m

Always invested

$309m

$400m

$300m

$200m

$100m

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

$50m

2016

2018

2020

2022

2024

2026

$300m

$210m

Timing strategy

Always-invested basket

Recession

GFC

COVID

2022 Inflation

Dot-com

Drawdown

Timing strategy

Always-invested basket

0%

-10%

-20%

-30%

-40%

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020

2022

2024

2026

Max DD

-15.3%

Max DD

(illustrative)

−15.3%

Max drawdown

18 months*

Recovery time

0.29

Calmar ratio

Illustrative

Time underwater

−15.3%

Max drawdown

18 months*

Recovery time

0.29

Calmar ratio

Illustrative

Time underwater

UNDER WHAT CONDITIONS DID IT WORK?

Where the strategy was strongest

Performance by regime

Return, risk-adjusted quality and sample size

SHARPE*

PERIODS*

Recession

Strong protection*

1.10*

5*

Strong

Falling rates

Supportive*

0.75*

7*

Positive

Expansion

Mixed*

0.15*

12*

Mixed

High inflation

Mixed*

-0.10*

5*

Mixed

Sideways markets

Weak*

-0.55*

9*

Weak

Regime takeaways

Recession protection was the clearest strength

Illustrative Sharpe of 1.10 across 5 recessionary periods

Falling-rate periods were generally supportive

Illustrative Sharpe of 0.75 across 7 periods

Sideways markets created whipsaw losses

The weakest regime, at an illustrative -0.55 Sharpe

Inflation results depended on timing

High inflation was mixed at an illustrative -0.10 Sharpe

NEXT RECOMMENDED STEP

Robustness validation

Overall confidence: Preliminary

This prototype backtest shows a promising historical pattern, but reliability checks have not been completed yet.

Run robustness validation before treating the result as reliable.

Explore validation in the research story ↗

HOW THE BACKTEST WORKED

The rules and assumptions behind the result

Universe

5-asset basket

SPY EFA BND VNQ...

Period

2000–Present

Since 2000

Signal

10-month SMA

Close price

Allocation

20% sleeve

Per eligible

Rebalance

Monthly close

Rebalance

Costs

Illustrative

bps round-turn

Cash treatment

Illustrative

Illustrative

Capacity

$100m

Illustrative

WHAT SHOULD I DO NEXT?

Continue the research

Source: Epoch strategy prototype · Illustrative data · No live backtest or trading